<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Would Donald Draper Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gypsybandito.com/what-would-donald-draper-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gypsybandito.com/what-would-donald-draper-blog/</link>
	<description>The wandering thoughts of a digital nomad...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Draper vs Anaïs Nin on blogging, transparency and trust</title>
		<link>http://www.gypsybandito.com/what-would-donald-draper-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-18336</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Draper vs Anaïs Nin on blogging, transparency and trust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gypsybandito.com/?p=1542#comment-18336</guid>
		<description>[...] about the concepts of transparency and trust on the Internet, and he says in his post &#8220;What Would Donald Draper Blog?&#8220; that building your personal brand is not about sharing everything. He notes that Don Draper [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about the concepts of transparency and trust on the Internet, and he says in his post &#8220;What Would Donald Draper Blog?&#8220; that building your personal brand is not about sharing everything. He notes that Don Draper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.gypsybandito.com/what-would-donald-draper-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-18335</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gypsybandito.com/?p=1542#comment-18335</guid>
		<description>Maintaining the mystery is, I think, much easier for men (not to make this a totally sexist discussion). Women are rather expected to share, and to overshare, and to give personal information easily. They bare their souls as well as their bodies. I was thinking about it this morning: how hard is it to get a man to agree to strip for nude photos, knowing they will be published? It&#039;s practically impossible. Women, by and large, will start undressing the moment the request is out of your mouth. Why? If I knew that, my friend, I would be a rich woman.

Anyway, I guess my point is that men are more used to playing things close to the vest, based on the quirks of our culture, and it just makes me wonder how women can maintain their mystery if it depends on a sense of sex appeal. As for Don Draper, well... I&#039;ve never seen the show, so I have no idea how he retains his mystery, except probably by keeping his mouth shut and stiff-upper-lippin&#039; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maintaining the mystery is, I think, much easier for men (not to make this a totally sexist discussion). Women are rather expected to share, and to overshare, and to give personal information easily. They bare their souls as well as their bodies. I was thinking about it this morning: how hard is it to get a man to agree to strip for nude photos, knowing they will be published? It&#8217;s practically impossible. Women, by and large, will start undressing the moment the request is out of your mouth. Why? If I knew that, my friend, I would be a rich woman.</p>
<p>Anyway, I guess my point is that men are more used to playing things close to the vest, based on the quirks of our culture, and it just makes me wonder how women can maintain their mystery if it depends on a sense of sex appeal. As for Don Draper, well&#8230; I&#8217;ve never seen the show, so I have no idea how he retains his mystery, except probably by keeping his mouth shut and stiff-upper-lippin&#8217; it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.gypsybandito.com/what-would-donald-draper-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-18329</link>
		<dc:creator>CT Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gypsybandito.com/?p=1542#comment-18329</guid>
		<description>Something interesting that came up in the discussion was the difference between transparency and authenticity. Both of these lend to someone&#039;s trust economy, but &lt;b&gt;they aren&#039;t the same thing&lt;/b&gt;.

Of course, your premeditated personal brand is just a character, so that character can be transparent in a way without being inauthentic -- i.e. this is what the &lt;i&gt;character&lt;/i&gt; would really think. As the man said, all the world&#039;s a stage.

As for mystery, that also came up in the discussion. One of the things that makes Don so appealing is his mystery, and we were wondering how he could leverage social media and still maintain the mystery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something interesting that came up in the discussion was the difference between transparency and authenticity. Both of these lend to someone&#8217;s trust economy, but <b>they aren&#8217;t the same thing</b>.</p>
<p>Of course, your premeditated personal brand is just a character, so that character can be transparent in a way without being inauthentic &#8212; i.e. this is what the <i>character</i> would really think. As the man said, all the world&#8217;s a stage.</p>
<p>As for mystery, that also came up in the discussion. One of the things that makes Don so appealing is his mystery, and we were wondering how he could leverage social media and still maintain the mystery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.gypsybandito.com/what-would-donald-draper-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-18327</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gypsybandito.com/?p=1542#comment-18327</guid>
		<description>Transparency is one of those terms that people like to throw around, because it implies that if one puts all one&#039;s cards on the table, this action indicates trustworthiness. Businesses should be more transparent, but I agree with you that people should not. After all, transparency also indicates an unfavourable straightforwardness, being able to see through someone who is attempting a façade that they struggle to maintain. Personal branding is not about tweeting what you ate for lunch, as you say, and revealing too much is not good for your brand.

Someone once told me &quot;mystery is sexy,&quot; and the older I get, the more I believe this to be true. As a writer, however, it&#039;s important to figure out which part to tell and which to leave out, because sometimes you need to tell more in order to reveal less. A classic example is in screenwriting, when you must indicate that there is a bomb in someone&#039;s briefcase. You don&#039;t show the bomb, but you show a man with a briefcase, entering a building. You then show the briefcase, the man leaving without his briefcase, and then a building exploding. You don&#039;t ever write the bomb, but you write the events leading up to, and including, the explosion; you write more, but reveal less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transparency is one of those terms that people like to throw around, because it implies that if one puts all one&#8217;s cards on the table, this action indicates trustworthiness. Businesses should be more transparent, but I agree with you that people should not. After all, transparency also indicates an unfavourable straightforwardness, being able to see through someone who is attempting a façade that they struggle to maintain. Personal branding is not about tweeting what you ate for lunch, as you say, and revealing too much is not good for your brand.</p>
<p>Someone once told me &#8220;mystery is sexy,&#8221; and the older I get, the more I believe this to be true. As a writer, however, it&#8217;s important to figure out which part to tell and which to leave out, because sometimes you need to tell more in order to reveal less. A classic example is in screenwriting, when you must indicate that there is a bomb in someone&#8217;s briefcase. You don&#8217;t show the bomb, but you show a man with a briefcase, entering a building. You then show the briefcase, the man leaving without his briefcase, and then a building exploding. You don&#8217;t ever write the bomb, but you write the events leading up to, and including, the explosion; you write more, but reveal less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

